TSTP Solution File: SEV377^5 by Nitpick---2016
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Nitpick---2016
% Problem : SEV377^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% Computer : n083.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 14:57:09 EST 2017
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 24.25s
% Output : FiniteModel 24.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SEV377^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.02/0.25 % Computer : n083.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.25 % Memory : 32218.75MB
% 0.02/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.25 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 00:21:34 CST 2017
% 0.02/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 24.25/17.23 Nitpicking formula...
% 24.25/17.23 Timestamp: 00:21:42
% 24.25/17.23 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be
% 24.25/17.23 able to skip some scopes
% 24.25/17.23 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 24.25/17.23 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 24.25/17.23 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 24.25/17.23 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 24.25/17.23 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 24.25/17.23 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 24.25/17.23 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 24.25/17.23 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 24.25/17.23 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 24.25/17.23 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2:
% 24.25/17.23
% 24.25/17.23 Skolem constants:
% 24.25/17.23 Xf = i1
% 24.25/17.23 Xg = i1
% 24.25/17.23 Xx = i1
% 24.25/17.23 Constants:
% 24.25/17.23 bnd_cGVB_APPLY =
% 24.25/17.23 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.25/17.23 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1),
% 24.25/17.23 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1))
% 24.25/17.23 bnd_cGVB_COMPOSE =
% 24.25/17.23 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.25/17.23 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2),
% 24.25/17.23 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2))
% 24.25/17.23 bnd_cGVB_DOMAIN = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2)
% 24.25/17.23 bnd_cGVB_FUNCTION = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 24.25/17.23 bnd_cGVB_IN =
% 24.25/17.23 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.25/17.23 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True),
% 24.25/17.23 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False))
% 24.25/17.23 % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 24.25/17.23 Total time: 2.9 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------